Home โ€บ Cell Biology โ€บ How CUT&RUN Profiles Chromatin | Cell Signaling Technology
Steps
  1. 1 Introduce protein-DNA interactions and experimental context 00:06
  2. 2 Compare ChIP-seq to CUT&RUN methodology 00:29
  3. 3 Prepare cells and permeabilize with digitonin 00:57
  4. 4 Add antibody and recruit micrococcal nuclease 01:18
  5. 5 Perform targeted DNA cleavage with calcium 01:35
  6. 6 Isolate digested DNA in supernatant 01:46
  7. 7 Add spike-in controls and compare advantages 02:07
  8. 8 Select appropriate CUT&RUN kit and reagents 02:37
Cell Biology Cell Signaling Technology

How CUT&RUN Profiles Chromatin | Cell Signaling Technology

Protocol
Difficulty
intermediate

Steps

1
Introduce protein-DNA interactions and experimental context

The narrator explains that protein-DNA interactions drive biological processes like gene expression and cell differentiation. Understanding when and where these interactions occur is essential for studying epigenetics in normal development and disease.

โ–ถ 00:06
2
Compare ChIP-seq to CUT&RUN methodology

Traditional ChIP-seq requires three days of work including chromatin crosslinking, fragmentation, immunoprecipitation, and DNA purification. CUT&RUN offers a faster alternative method with distinct advantages over the conventional approach.

โ–ถ 00:29
3
Prepare cells and permeabilize with digitonin

Harvest cells and bind them to magnetic beads to simplify handling and minimize sample loss. Permeabilize the cells with digitoninโ€”no crosslinking fixative is needed, allowing chromatin to remain in its native state.

โ–ถ 00:57
4
Add antibody and recruit micrococcal nuclease

Add antibodies targeting your protein of interest (transcription factors, cofactors, or histone modifications) to the permeabilized cells. Then add the enzyme Protein A-Protein G-Micrococcal Nuclease complex, which binds to the antibody through protein A or G interactions.

โ–ถ 01:18
5
Perform targeted DNA cleavage with calcium

Add calcium to activate the micrococcal nuclease enzyme, which cuts DNA at sites where proteins interact with chromatin. This design provides precise targeting and effective control of nuclease activity.

โ–ถ 01:35
6
Isolate digested DNA in supernatant

The DNA-containing complexes diffuse freely into the supernatant, while remaining chromatin is retained in the cell nucleus. This separation greatly simplifies subsequent DNA purification steps.

โ–ถ 01:46
7
Add spike-in controls and compare advantages

Add spike-in control DNA to ensure experimental reproducibility. CUT&RUN generates lower background with less starting material compared to ChIP-seq and requires fewer sequencing reads, completing analysis in just one to two days.

โ–ถ 02:07
8
Select appropriate CUT&RUN kit and reagents

Choose from Cell Signaling Technology's flexible CUT&RUN options: complete detection kits with all buffers and controls, or individual reagents and enzymes. Add validated primary antibodies specific to your target protein to complete the experiment.

โ–ถ 02:37

๐Ÿšจ Failure Case Library (12) + Submit your own case

severe
Low Signal from Using N-ChIP for Weak DNA-Binding Proteins
Consistently low or absent signal when studying transcription factors or chromatin-associated proteins using native ChIP (N-ChIP). Histone ChIP experiments work well in the same laboratory.
๐Ÿ’ก 4 ยท โœ“ 4
severe
Non-specific Protein Binding to Antibody
Multiple protein bands appear in IP eluate that are not related to the target antigen, indicating proteins binding non-specifically to the antibody Fc region or other antibody domains.
๐Ÿ’ก 4 ยท โœ“ 4
severe
No Protein Detected: Antibody-Bead Binding Failure
No target protein recovered after IP procedure. Antibody may not be properly immobilized on beads, resulting in loss during washing steps.
๐Ÿ’ก 4 ยท โœ“ 5
severe
Low Signal for Phosphorylated or Modified Proteins
IP of post-translationally modified proteins yields weak or no signal. Input lysate shows low basal levels of phosphorylated or modified target protein despite total protein presence.
๐Ÿ’ก 4 ยท โœ“ 5
severe
No Signal Due to Stringent Lysis Buffer
No signal detected in co-immunoprecipitation experiment. Target protein appears absent despite expected expression.
๐Ÿ’ก 4 ยท โœ“ 4
severe
No Protein Detected: Lysis Buffer Incompatibility
Target protein not detected in IP despite using sufficient antibody and confirmed protein expression. Antibody may fail to recognize target due to protein denaturation or improper folding.
๐Ÿ’ก 4 ยท โœ“ 4
severe
Low/No Signal from Insufficient Protein Expression
No detectable signal in IP experiment. Input lysate control shows weak or absent target protein band on western blot.
๐Ÿ’ก 4 ยท โœ“ 4
moderate
Insufficient Bead Blocking Leading to Background
High background caused by non-specific proteins binding directly to the bead matrix surface rather than the antibody, appearing as multiple bands in negative controls with beads alone.
๐Ÿ’ก 4 ยท โœ“ 4
moderate
Low IP Efficiency from Suboptimal IgG-Bead Binding
IP shows weak target protein recovery despite adequate antibody concentration and protein expression. Bead pellet appears smaller than expected or shows poor antibody capture.
๐Ÿ’ก 3 ยท โœ“ 4
moderate
Non-Specific Protein Binding to Beads or IgG
Multiple non-specific bands appear on western blot after IP. Background signal present in bead-only or isotype control lanes, indicating off-target protein capture.
๐Ÿ’ก 4 ยท โœ“ 4
moderate
Low IP Efficiency from Incorrect Bead Selection
Weak IP signal despite good input control. Low recovery of target protein compared to expected levels based on antibody quality.
๐Ÿ’ก 4 ยท โœ“ 4
moderate
Excessive Antibody Causing Non-specific Binding
High background observed when using too much antibody in the IP reaction, leading to increased non-specific protein interactions and higher background in the eluate.
๐Ÿ’ก 4 ยท โœ“ 4
๐Ÿ’ฌ Comments coming soon