Home Molecular Biology qPCR Principles, Experimental Workflow and Results Analysis
Molecular Biology Bilibili (China-Accessible Mirrors)

qPCR Principles, Experimental Workflow and Results Analysis

🚨 Failure Case Library (11) + Submit your own case

critical
No amplification — Ct value missing or > 40
Amplification plot is flat for both target and reference; software reports "no Ct" or Ct > 40 even for positive controls.
💡 5 · ✓ 5
critical
Complete Absence of PCR Product
No bands visible on agarose gel after PCR amplification, indicating complete reaction failure.
💡 6 · ✓ 6
critical
False Positive PCR Results from DNA Contamination
No-template controls (NTC) or negative controls show unexpected amplification. Particularly problematic in sensitive applications like human identification qPCR where trace DNA contamination produces false positives.
💡 3 · ✓ 3
severe
Poor Ct reproducibility — high within-group variability
Technical replicates of the same sample have SD > 0.5 cycles; standard curve linearity is poor; loading order influences results.
💡 5 · ✓ 5
severe
Reference gene is unstable — normalization fails
Reference gene Ct varies > 1 cycle between samples; trend of reference vs target gene disagrees; normalization gives strange results.
💡 4 · ✓ 4
severe
High Background Signal Due to Insufficient ChIP Washing
Elevated background signal appears across all samples including negative controls, with nonspecific amplification in qPCR. PCR products may show multiple bands or high Ct values in control regions.
💡 4 · ✓ 5
severe
PCR Sample Evaporation and Loss During Cycling
Visible reduction in reaction volume after thermal cycling, with condensation on tube caps or film. May result in concentrated reagents, failed reactions, or inability to recover product.
💡 3 · ✓ 3
severe
PCR ReadyMix Works for PCR but Fails in qPCR
ReadyMix produces amplification in standard PCR but completely fails in real-time qPCR applications; equivalent products from other suppliers work well
💡 3 · ✓ 3
moderate
Amplification Plots Dip Below Zero Due to Incorrect Baseline Settings
Amplification plots are clearly abnormal with sections dipping below zero dR; data cannot be used as presented; plots appear distorted
💡 3 · ✓ 4
moderate
Incorrect Reaction Efficiency Due to Oligo Binding to Non-Molecular Biology Tubes
Variable and incorrect standard curve efficiency when using serial dilutions; effect more pronounced when same dilution series stored at 4°C and reused; inconsistent differences between amplification plots; problem resolves when different operator uses different tubes
💡 4 · ✓ 5
moderate
Irregular Standard Curve Spacing Due to Sample Inhibitors
Cq data for standard curve dilutions are irregularly spaced; ΔCq between dilutions is inconsistent and decreases with increasing dilutions; replicates are precise but pattern is abnormal
💡 3 · ✓ 5
💬 Comments coming soon