Home Biochemistry R&D Systems Quantikine ELISA Operation Guide
Biochemistry Bilibili (China-Accessible Mirrors)

R&D Systems Quantikine ELISA Operation Guide

🚨 Failure Case Library (20) + Submit your own case

critical
Absent Standard Curve Signal with Normal Zero Standard
No detectable signal is observed for standard curve points containing analyte, while the zero standard (maximum binding control) shows normal OD values, indicating complete loss of competitive inhibition.
💡 4 · ✓ 4
critical
No Signal or Weak Signal in ELISA
After developing the ELISA plate, wells show no color change or very faint signal that is barely above background, even for positive controls or high-concentration standards.
💡 6 · ✓ 6
critical
No Signal or Weak Signal in ELISA
No detectable signal or very weak signal across all wells, including standard wells. The plate reader shows absorbance values near baseline or significantly lower than expected.
💡 6 · ✓ 6
critical
No Signal for Standard Curve with Normal Zero Standard
All standard concentrations show no signal (high OD in competitive format similar to zero standard), while the zero standard (no competitor) shows normal maximum binding signal.
💡 4 · ✓ 4
severe
OD Value of Zero Standard Too Low
The zero standard (maximum binding, no competitor) shows insufficient optical density signal, providing inadequate dynamic range for the competitive assay and poor B/B0 calculations.
💡 4 · ✓ 4
severe
Buffer Components Inhibit Detection Enzyme
No or very weak signal despite correct antibody binding. Signal loss occurs after addition of detection reagent. Other wells using different buffers show normal signal.
💡 4 · ✓ 4
severe
High CV from Plate Edge Effects
Outer (edge) wells show systematically different absorbance values compared to inner wells, with CV >15%. Edge wells may show higher or lower signal depending on evaporation or temperature variation. Visual inspection from the side reveals lower buffer levels in edge wells.
💡 5 · ✓ 5
severe
Poor Dynamic Range Between Signal and Background
The difference between maximum signal (high standards) and background (blank wells) is compressed, typically less than 5-fold, making it difficult to distinguish between samples of different concentrations.
💡 5 · ✓ 5
severe
High Inter-Assay CV from Inconsistent Sample Storage
High inter-assay coefficient of variation (>15%) when the same samples are tested across different runs. Sample readings decrease over time or vary unpredictably between runs.
💡 5 · ✓ 5
severe
Incomplete Standard Reconstitution with Visible Particulates
After adding reconstitution buffer to lyophilized standard, visible undissolved material or particulates remain in the vial, leading to inaccurate standard concentrations.
💡 4 · ✓ 6
severe
Inadequate Blocking of Non-Specific Binding Sites
Uniformly elevated background across plate with high coefficient of variation. Background may be particularly high in wells with lower antigen concentrations.
💡 4 · ✓ 4
severe
High Uniform Background Signal
All wells show elevated absorbance including blanks and negative controls, creating a uniformly high background that reduces signal-to-noise ratio and compresses the standard curve.
💡 5 · ✓ 5
moderate
Incubation Temperature Below Optimal Range
Consistently weak signal across all samples including positive controls. Signal improves when experiment is repeated with attention to temperature. Longer incubations partially compensate.
💡 4 · ✓ 4
moderate
Unexpected or Inconsistent Assay Results
Sample quantification values are outside expected biological range, controls fail to meet acceptance criteria, or results are not reproducible between runs despite similar experimental conditions.
💡 5 · ✓ 5
moderate
Biological Sample Not in Detectable Range
Standard curve appears normal, but sample wells show no signal or signal below the lowest standard. This occurs when the analyte concentration in samples is below the assay detection limit.
💡 4 · ✓ 4
moderate
High Variability Between Experimental Runs
Standard curves or sample values differ significantly between experiments run on different days, despite using the same reagents and protocol, showing poor reproducibility.
💡 5 · ✓ 5
moderate
Edge and Drift Effects on ELISA Plate
Wells at the plate edges show systematically higher or lower absorbance than center wells, or a gradient pattern appears across the plate, affecting data quality especially for samples in edge positions.
💡 5 · ✓ 5
moderate
Bacterial Contamination in Wash or Incubation Buffers
Sporadic signal loss or high background that worsens over time during multi-day experiments. Cloudy or turbid buffer appearance. Inconsistent results when using same buffer batch.
💡 4 · ✓ 5
minor
Sample Values Above Assay Range (Hook Effect Excluded)
Sample absorbance readings exceed the top standard, reading off the curve, while the standard curve itself appears normal with proper shape and dynamic range.
💡 2 · ✓ 3
minor
Green Color Upon Adding Stop Solution (Streptavidin-HRP)
When sulfuric acid stop solution is added to wells after TMB substrate incubation, a green color appears instead of the expected yellow, indicating incomplete mixing and pH gradient in the well.
💡 2 · ✓ 3
💬 Comments coming soon